ACKERMAN LAW
Menu
Expropriation Law
Cases
ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2020
Fontana v. Oxford (County) No.3
IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPROPRIATIONS ACT, RSO
1990, c. E-26
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
LUIGI FONTANA, MIRTO RUI, ANTONIO CALVANO AND
GIUSEPPE MARIGNANI IN TRUST (Claimants) and THE
CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF OXFORD
ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2020
Fontana v. Oxford (County) No.2
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 26(b) of
the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26, as amended
Claimant: Luigi Fontana, Mirto Rui, Antonio Calvano, and
Giuseppe Marignani, in trust
Respondent: County of Oxford
Subject: Land Compensation
ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2020
Fontana v. Oxford (County)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 26(b) of the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26, as amended
Claimant: Luigi Fontana, Mirto Rui, Antonio Calvano, and Giuseppe Marignani, in trust
Respondent: County of Oxford Subject: Land Compensation
Hearing Date - August 5,2010
Vinen Atlantic, S.A. v. TRCA
IN THE MATTER OF THE proposed expropriation ofland by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority with respect to approval to expropriate land being comprised of Part of Lots 376 and 377 on Registered Plan 164, City of Toronto, designated as Part 2 on Plan 66R-24704, identified as PIN 07624 0200 (LT) together with any riparian rights, if any, and any rights of Vinen Atlantic S.A. in Crown land CL2019, identified as part of the bed of Lake Ontario in front of Lot C, Range D, Geographic Township of Etobicoke, designated as part 2 on Plan 66R-24750, City of Toronto
Judgment: August 17, 2018*
Pinto v. Simcoe (County) No. 1
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 26(b) of the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E. 26, as amended
Claimants: Floyd Pinto and Maria Pinto
Respondent: County of Simcoe
Subject: Land Compensation
Judgment: August 14, 2019
Pinto v. Simcoe (County) No. 2
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 26(b) of the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26, as amended
Claimants: Floyd Pinto and Maria Pinto
Respondent: County of Simcoe
Subject: Land Compensation
date: june 12,2012
D.D.S INVESTMENTS LTD v. CITY OF TORONTO
IN THE MATTER OF THE Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.E. 26
COUNSEL:
Robert G. Ackerman for the Claimant
Brendan O’ Callaghan for the Respondent
date: december 15,2004
GILLESPIE v. MTO
Phyllis L. Gillespie (claimant) has made an application to the Ontario Municipal Board under section 26 of the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26, as amended, for determination by this Board of the compensation to be paid by the Ministry of Transportation (respondent) for land known as Part of the south east quarter of Lot 7, Concession 8, known municipally as 3354 Innisfil Beach Road in the Town of Innisfil
We are here to help, every step of the way.
To speak to us about your case please contact us at (905) 305-8844 in Markham or at (905) 623-1454 in Bowmanville. Alternatively, you can complete and submit a consultation request form online.
ACKERMAN LAW
©2019 Ackerman Law Office Professional Corporation | All Rights Reserved
Web Design By Caiden Media
contact us
York Region Office
-
675 Cochrane Dr, East Tower Suite 600
Markham, ON L3R 0B8 - (905) 305-8844
- (905) 305-8847
Durham Region Office
-
38B King St E
Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N2 - (905) 623-1454
- (866) 398-9336
Email Us
-
robert@ackermanlawoffice.com
cassandra@ackermanlawoffice.com
nicole@ackermanlawoffice.com